Everything that the philosopher writes – everything that I
have written – is nothing but a preface to an unwritten work or – which is, in the
end, the same – a postlude in which the ludus
is absent. Philosophical writing cannot but have a prefatory or epilogical nature. This means, perhaps, that this has not to do with that which can be
said through language, but with λόγος
(logos) itself, with the pure givenness of language as such. The event,
which is in question in language, can be only announced or dismissed, never
said (not that it is unsayable – unsayable means only un-predictable; this
coincides rather with the givenness of discourses, with the fact that men do not
cease to speak to one another). That which language succeeds in saying is only
preface or footnote, and philosophers, who distinguish themselves by whether they
prefer the first or the second, adhere to the poetic moment of thought (poetry
is always announcement) or to the gesture by which, in the end, they play the
lyre and contemplate. In any case, that which is contemplated is the unsaid;
the dismissal of the word coincides with its announcement.
–Giorgio Agamben, “On Writing Prefaces,” p. 131 (my
translation)
In: Giorgio
Agamben, Che cos’é la filosofia? [What is Philosophy]. Macerata:
Quodlibet, 2016, pp. 123-131.
An intriguing and thought-provoking excerpt.
ReplyDeleteHello, this weekend is good for me, since this time i am reading this enormous informative article here at my home. interpretation
ReplyDelete