Saturday, November 21, 2015

Defining Global Mental Health

Global Mental Health & Psychiatry Newsletter

Global Mental Health Forum


Prof. Vincenzo Di Nicola, MPhil, MD, PhD, FAPA
Université de Montréal


Defining Global Mental Health & Psychiatry


Issue: What is Global Mental Health & Psychiatry?

Forum Question: Is there an emerging consensus for re-visioning mental health and psychiatry in a global way that includes social concerns, recognizes cultural diversity, and embraces the mission of public health, comparing mental illness across cultures and around the world?

A metaphor for health: If we imagine health as a river winding around the world, there are tributaries which feed into the larger river, which flows into the sea.

The river of health and its tributaries:

* Medicine and well-being is the river
--“Global Health & Medicine” is its name
* Psychiatry is a tributary, with many rivulets: 
--Social Psychiatry
--Transcultural or simply Cultural Psychiatry (Lim, 2006)
--HBM Murphy (1982) of McGill defined this field as Comparative Psychiatry, “the international and intercultural distribution of mental illness”
* Public Health and Epidemiology are tributaries

In this view, Global Mental Health & Psychiatry is the emerging term for the tributary that collects all the rivulets (e.g., Social Psychiatry, Cultural Psychiatry, and Public Health) merging into the river of Global Health & Medicine (Cf. Okpaku, 2014; Sorel, 2012).

These rivulets and tributaries represent broader envelopes or contexts for psychiatry than more narrowly-defined disease-specific (e.g., mood disorders, eating disorders), age-specific (e.g., child, geriatric psychiatry), or intervention-specific (e.g., by therapeutic approach – psychodynamic psychiatry; or by activity – consultation-liaison psychiatry, integrated care) approaches.  


Challenges for GMH:

1.     Re: “Global”

Why does global mean?
(Cf. Okpaku, 2014; Sorel, 2012)
A global – i.e., “general” – approach?
A globally “embracing” approach, collecting and integrating approaches, schools, and traditions?
Global as in “worldwide” – in a democratic way or an imperialistic way?
(Cf. Ethan Watters, Crazy Like Us, 2011)

2.     Re: “Mental Health” vs. Psychiatry

Why mental health instead of psychiatry?
Marketing (health is more appealing than illness or “disorder”)
vs. identity (as physicians)

3.     Who is invited/feels welcome under this new umbrella?

Psychiatrists? Psychologists? The therapeutic communities of practice?
Public Health and Epidemiology?
Social scientists?
Policy makers?
Legislators?
Client groups?


References

Lim, Russell F. (2006). Clinical Manual of Cultural Psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

Murphy, H.B.M. (1982). Comparative Psychiatry: The International and Intercultural Distribution of Mental Illness. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Okpaku, Samuel, Ed. (2014). Essentials of Global Mental Health. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sorel,  Eliot, Ed. (2012). 21st Century Global Mental Health. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

Watters, Ethan (2011). Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche. New York: Free Press.

Saturday, August 29, 2015

UNDEAD! Phenomenology as the Zombie Science


Phenomenology has lost any real meaning!

It has largely become a way to unite people who have misgivings about their given field - philosophy, say, or psychology and psychiatry - and is a large and handy umbrella because it can mean anything you want it to mean, just as Lewis Caroll's Humpty-Dumpty declares.

Unlike Groucho Marx's concern about what kind of club he was joining, self-declared phenomenologists don't much care about the company they keep and whether any coherent theory or principles link them.

There is an important book called, "The End of Phenomenology" (Edinburgh University Press, 2014) by Tom Sparrow that says this eloquently and devastatingly.

After dedicating a year-long seminar at the Université de Montrèal to phenomenological philosopher Emmanuel Levinas, I concluded ever more clearly and somewhat bitterly that phenomenology is indeed dead. 

Or worse: undead! Phenomenology is that idea which, having no life and no power, refuses to lie still! This is phenomenology as a zombie science!

As I said in my essay, "States of exception, states of dissociation: Cyranoids, zombies and liminal people--An essay on the threshold between the human and the inhuman" (Di Nicola, 2011), zombies have become a contemporary trope for what is lifeless, dead but not buried, stagnant but obstinately clinging to a kind of life, like someone in a vegetative state neurologically but on artificial life support.

As an example of this meme or cultural trope in the larger culture (not just philosophy or psychiatry), a recent story in the New York Times describes China's "zombie factories" and a similar practice in Japan: 

"To protect jobs and plants, the government and its state-owned banks sometimes keep money-losing businesses on life-support by rolling over or restructuring loans, providing fresh credit or offering other aid." 

"In Japan, such businesses, known as 'zombie companies,' are blamed for contributing to that country's two decades of economic stagnation." 

Zombies are everywhere in contemporary culture - from video games to television and films on the big screen to descriptions of lifeless, unproductive companies "stalking" Asian economies and certainly as empty signifiers in philosophy and psychiatry. As a contemporary cultural trope, zombies signify the evacuation of the human.

Phenomenology, which prides itself so much on understanding and dignifying what is human about our experience, has become an empty exercise at best and a signifier of the very opposite of its vaunted ambitions at worst. By its imprecision and incoherence, phenomenology today has come to mean the evacuation of the human.


References

Di Nicola, Vincenzo. "States of exception, states of dissociation: Cyranoids, zombies and liminal people--An essay on the threshold between the human and the inhuman." In: Letters to a Young Therapist: Relational Practices and the Coming Community. New York & Dresden: Atropos Press, 2011, pp. 149-162.

Schuman, Michael. Zombie factories stalk the sputtering Chinese economy. International New York Times, August 28, 2015. 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/30/business/international/zombie-factories-stalk-the-sputtering-chinese-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0. Accessed: 29.08.2015

Sparrow, Tom. The End of Phenomenology: Metaphysics and the New Realism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014. 


Sunday, August 2, 2015

So Much Trauma, So Close to Home: Seeing Beyond the Bidonvilles to Celebrate Porosity in Port-au-Prince


Newsletter of the Global Mental Health & Psychiatry Caucus
of the American Psychiatric Association

Vincenzo Di Nicola, MPhil, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FAPA
Professor of Psychiatry, University of Montreal
Representative to the APA Assembly
Past-President of the Quebec & Eastern Canada District Branch
Newsletter Zonal Co-Editor for the Americas

AS A LIFE-LONG STUDENT of trauma and as a francophone psychiatrist working in Montreal, a sojourn in Haiti’s devastated capital, Port-au-Prince, beckoned me for many years. Whenever I asked a Haitian colleague about visiting Haiti, he would say, wait for things to settle down. First it was due to politics, following the ouster of President Aristide in 2004, later it was the devastation in the wake of the earthquake that fairly leveled the capital city in 2010.

Almost no one encouraged such a visit! Neither Haitians themselves, nor my colleagues in health care supported it. Their message conveyed a perfect storm of devastation, destitution and danger. Those who survived the earthquake and those who worked there in its aftermath transmitted lessons about “trauma”—traumatic events (poverty, violence, disasters), a traumatized population in survival mode, and traumatizing experiences (alienating experiences on the streets and with the health care system). Finally, with support from three sources – the University of Montreal’s Department of Psychiatry, APA’s Global Mental Health & Psychiatry Caucus, and the Harvard Program for Refugee Trauma – I was on my way.

When the Global Mental Health Caucus meeting was held at the APA Annual Meeting in Toronto this year, I spoke to the disabling notion that we come to other places as experts with knowledge and skills, diagnoses and solutions. On the eve of my first visit to Haiti, I set myself the challenge to learn from my hosts and my encounters with Haitians.

So, what did I learn during my Haitian sojourn?

“LA KAY SE LA KAY.” First, it would be foolish to deny the problems that are evident everywhere in Haiti. To adapt the title of Raymond Carver’s short stories, in Haiti there is so much trauma, so close to home. And yet, I believe that as psychiatrists, we see trauma after the fact, like an ambulance arriving after the accident. It’s a crucial point: we often see effects and consequences, not the trauma itself. We do not have direct access to the human experience that we call trauma. And these impacts are not always traumatizing, which I understand to mean limiting or disabling. In Port-au-Prince, signs of physical disaster are more evident than signs of disabling human trauma. While the walls of the city declare in Creole, LA VI PA FACIL, Life Isn’t Easy, they also affirm that, LA KAY SE LA KAY, Home Sweet Home.

“This Too Shall Pass!” Second, there is the question of state structures, resources and solutions. In geopolitical circles, the concepts of failed states, collapsed states and fragile states have been floated. Do they apply to Haiti? Well, it depends. While I prefer the nuances of fragility rather than failure, it depends on whether the concept applies strictly to a state’s sovereignty or to the people. If it’s true that the state has failed or is fragile, it’s equally important to witness that the people have not! One of my hosts taught me a Haitian saying, “CAP—Cela aussi passera!” This too shall pass! Several of my Haitian hosts understand this attitude not as fatalistic but as pragmatic resignation. What would trigger a strike in the neighboring Dominican Republic, over bus fares, for example, is met with weary resignation by Haitians, according to my Haitian host, psychiatrist Dr. Hans Lamarre, President-Elect of our APA District Branch in Quebec and Eastern Canada. Haitians are at once both resigned and guardedly hopeful!

A palpable spirituality pervades the entire public experience of Port-au-Prince! I asked this question many times: Did the earthquake change the people’s faith? The unanimous answer, declared on the buses and walls of the city with such affirmations as—DIEU TOUT PUISSANCE, All Power Is God’s, and BON DIEU AVANT TOUT, God Is Good, Above All—is that disasters fortify rather than shake the people’s faith.

Porosity. Finally, my visits to other places helped me see beyond half-destroyed, half-rebuilt buildings, to witness material poverty abutting cultural richness. I avoided the “disaster tourism” that I experienced in Rio de Janeiro, New Orleans, and Buenos Aires. Ghettos, favelas, bidonvilles—whatever we call them, from Portugal’s barrios de lata (shanty towns) to the ciudades perdidas (lost cities) of Mexico, slums dot the world, residing within, on top of, beside or below the world’s major cities.

Port-au-Prince, in mountainous Haiti, is one big Rio de Janeiro with bidonvilles clinging precariously to the mountains while the government buildings, hospitals, schools and churches that still stand after the 2010 earthquake crowd the city’s plateau. But it is also a Caribbean Naples. Walter Benjamin’s essay on Naples captured its most abundant quality—porosity. And like Naples, Port-au-Prince is porous, incomplete, unfinished, with boundaries and categories bleeding into each other, overflowing with jarring juxtapositions: funky art galleries beside “Gingerbread” ruins, street slogans and banners in the people’s Créole amid a panoply of ads for private schools in proudly refined colonial French, symbols of African Vaudoun that we know as “Voodoo,” intermingled with French Catholicism, and everything for sale on the streets in a city suffused with spirituality. Port-au-Prince is vulgar and refined, sacred and profane, impoverished and privileged—much as Naples, New Orleans, and Salvador, Bahia, port cities of the world where the culture rises from the sea and the ground up.

In sum, as a cultural psychiatrist, I observe everywhere that the work of culture—dialogues and relations, knowledge and solutions—is acquired and constructed, not merely hard-wired. This was magnificently manifest during my sojourn among Haitians through the beauty of their poetry, their art and sculpture, their adaptability, and their unshakeable faith. And the Creole art of living porously is what will bring me back to learn more about the culture of Ayiti, Haiti.

Haiti Mission Report and Strategic Plan


In the spirit of the above carnet de voyage or travel diary, here is a partial list of activities, contacts and projects during my first mission in Haiti in May of 2015:


· Inaugural lectures on child psychiatry at the Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université Notre Dame d'Haïti (FMSS-UNDH), supported by the Dean, Dr. Jean Hugues Henrys, and the Vice-Dean for Teaching, Dr. Audie Metayer, of FMSS-UNDH. These were the first lectures on children’s mental health needs in Haiti. Furthermore, there are no child psychiatrists in Haiti and no child psychiatry services there.

· Visit to the Mars and Kline Psychiatric Hospital, Port-au-Prince, where I participated with Dr. Hans Lamarre in a clinical seminar with psychiatry residents and medical students.

· Colloquium at URAMEL - Unité de Recherche et d'Action Médico Légale – Fondation de France/Unit for Research and Forensic Action, Port-au-Prince, on “Our Youth at Risk,” attended by psychiatry residents, psychologists and a variety of local health care professionals and medical leaders.

· Meeting with psychiatric and business leaders, Dr. Claude Manigat and Mr. Oswald Brun, who have recently founded the Fondation Haïtienne de la Santé Mentale/Haitian Foundation for Mental Health. I offered to work with them concerning youth and families in Haiti.

· Meeting with Pastor Clément Joseph's interfaith group – Mission Sociale des Églises/Pastoral Social Mission – to help them build a plan for psychosocial support in the wake of disasters, natural and man-made. Pastor Joseph is a strong leader with charisma, an ecumenical mission and an established community resource base. We have reached out to Dr. Eliot Sorel, the Chair of the Global Mental Health & Psychiatry Caucus, and U.S. Gen. Russell Honoré, a distinguished leader in the field of disaster planning, both of whom have offered their assistance to this group. Pastor Joseph invited me to work with two groups – the interfaith coalition and a group of 25 pastors to sensitize them on children and family issues.

· Meeting with Haitian psychologists who are foreign-trained (France and Belgium) and in private practice seeking training, supervision and support in couples and family therapy. They could be the founding group for Haitian marital and family therapy with our support. They plan to bring me back to Haiti for advanced training, supervision and professional support.

There are too few psychiatrists and no child psychiatrists in Haiti, a country of an estimated population of 9.446 million people in 2006. A WHO study published in 2011 identified 27 psychiatrists there, but the leaders I met informed me that the number is perhaps only half of that! More critical than the limited human resources is the “treatment gap” in children’s mental health care. Even where there are epidemiological studies that establish the prevalence of identifiable mental health challenges, significant treatment gaps exist between those challenges and access to care, including in much better resourced nations such as the USA! 

In the light of these observations, I want to identify people who are already working with youth, families, and communities in order to find local partners for my mission. I believe we can identify four distinct groups: 

  1. FMSS-UNDH for preparing future physicians and planting seeds. Dr. Richard Mollica, Director of the Harvard Program for Refugee Trauma (HPRT), has been working with Fr. Jean-Charles Wismick, Ph.D., Vice-Rector for Academic and Scientific Affairs at UNDH, to establish a mental health program with both teaching and clinical components.

  1. URAMEL for their broad NGO-style mandate to work with medico-legal issues but also a wider vision that includes mental health.

  1. Mission Sociale des Églises/Pastoral Social Mission – community-based and outreach-focused interfaith group with a mission and a vision.

  1. High-level professionals with training and experience at international standards who are in private practice and who serve a certain class while taking part in planning and support to other organisms with a broader reach; my hope is that supporting this group will establish new ideas and practices in Haiti, that eventually, through “trickle-down” and “tracking-through,” will benefit more of Haitian society.

In short, the local and national human resources in Haiti are solid, creative and inspiring! They have the leadership, drive and task-orientation that is needed for building a better society. My own limited mission is part of a larger one that involves colleagues in pediatrics and will soon include obstetrics-gynecology and surgery.

Our mission in global mental health involves Dr. Hans Lamarre, Haiti Mission Director, and Dr. Emmanuel Stip, Chair of the Dept. of Psychiatry at the Université de Montréal/University of Montreal, working closely with Fr. Wismick at the UNDH and Dr. Mollica at the HPRT, and the support of Dr. Sorel, Chair of the APA GMH&P Caucus. Together, we are participating in a historic opportunity to build sustainable programs for integrated, total health of children, families, and communities in Haiti.

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Slightgeist (more on Slow Thought)


We are living not so much a discernible zeitgeist as an amorphous, evanescent “slightgeist.” This is a very slim spirit of the times, indeed! All pronouncements evaporate by mid-day like the morning dew! They must make way for new pronouncements, for the next person’s fifteen minutes of fame.  Of all the paltry contributions of the slightgeist artist Andy Warhol, this one I predict will last, but with a speedy twist: Everyone will be famous for fifteen seconds! Or as Milan Kundera put it in one of his short stories, “Let the old dead make room for the new dead.”[1]

*

We are stuck in the slightgeist of fast forward.[2]

And it has two elements: self and speed.

The slightgeist is a two-stroke engine of self and speed, in a hurry to be somebody on the road to somewhere, but in reality making us all nobodies going nowhere. And we all write obsessively, compulsively with more and more “news from nowhere.”[3]

“I always thought that it would be better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody,” says the psychopathic protagonist of Patricia Highsmith’s novel, The Talented Mr. Ripley.[4]  That’s what makes our times so slight: pretentiousness authenticity is opposed to a feared vapidness.

“EVERYBODY has won and all must have prizes,” announces the Dodo in Alice in Wonderland. Being a fake somebody is to live in the same wonderland as Alice and Dodo where everybody wins.

Combined with the relentless entitlements accorded to the saturated self, this means we are living ever more isolated lives, meaninglessly connected to distant “friends,” with the empty demand to “Like” this or that and add more and more contacts, friends, and connections to an already saturated social network.

This is perfectly embodied by wikipedia.

Nothing that exists off the grid, including intimate personal knowledge or well-crafted professional opinions can be included in wikipedia articles. If it’s not already on the web, it doesn’t exist for wikipedia. But here’s the paradox: all the achievements that are logged on wikipedia are elsewhere! It is a self-referential and absurd logic. It is solipsistic. It creates its own autistic world.



Andy Warhol: Slightgeist – Sleightgiest – I-Con-ic Artist

Warhol is known for the happening, for capturing the moment, for the accelerated notion of art by cultural quotation. Pop art, turning popular items like the Campbell soup can and icons like Marilyn Monroe into images, created a culture of branding. Art as concept and performance. No originality or talent needed. Warhol as an “artist” is like an exhibition of book covers or record album covers, with only implicit reference to the contents of the writing or the music. A recent exhibition in Montreal did just that – Warhol’s record covers were on display. He “created” the Velvet Underground by making them his house band and “produced” their record, imposing Nico on them. Warhol is a producer of images which creates a market of consumers. No quality, no reflection, no second thoughts are necessary. This is “art” as mere consumption from the “artist” as mere producer.

He is now one of the most high-priced producers of images in history. Imagine that! The slightgeist is getting slighter. And worse, Warhol’s legacy is to turn the already paltry slightgeist into a sleightgeist. Warhol is outlasting his fifteen minutes of fame to become the i-con-ic artist of the 21st century. I-CON-IC: Cunning and deceitful. With no hint of the creativity of Apollinaire and Marinetti, the playfulness of Marcel Duchamp or the irony and satire of Ionesco and Stoppard. Just a straight-faced “I-con” job with that humourless face topped by an absurd wig that functions like a mask.





[1] Milan Kundera, “Let the Old Dead Make Room for the New Dead,” in Laughable Loves, trans. by Suzanne Rapaport, intro. by Philip Roth (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1974), pp. 163-194.
[2] This is a reference to Damien Broderick’s and Rory Barnes’ Science Fiction novel, Stuck in Fast Forward (New York: HarperCollins, 1999).
[3] This is a reference to William Morris’ 1890 utopian Science Fiction novel, News from Nowhere. See: News from Nowhere and Other Writings (New York: Penguin Books, 1994).
[4] Patricia Highsmith, The Talented Mr. Ripley (New York: Coward-McCann, 1955).

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

WPA Symposium Contribution - "Belonging Without Boundaries: Settlers, Sojourners and Travellers in the 21st Century"


World Psychiatric Association Congress  
Bucharest, Romania - April 10, 2013

“Symposium on Belonging”

Co-chairs:             Vincenzo Di Nicola and Rachid Bennegadi
Discussant:            Rachid Bennegadi

Abstract (word count: 384)

Belonging Without Boundaries:
Settlers, Sojourners and Travellers in the 21st Century

Vincenzo Di Nicola, MPhil, MD, PhD, FAPA
Professor of Psychiatry, University of Montreal

“The Church of God sojourning in Rome to the Church of God sojourning in Corinth.”
—Clement’s Letter to the Corinthians

In Clement’s letter, the Greek paroikousa (sojourning) means a provisional abode as opposed to katokein, the citizen with residence, from which we may derive two modes of living: parokein (to sojourn like a stranger) and katokein (to reside like a citizen). His message was that the Church was not a permanent structure but a sojourn and that Christians live in messianic time.

The 20th century saw so many displacements of peoples across borders, languages and cultures that the terms emigrants, immigrants and migrants are sprinkled across the literature of every field of human endeavour from law to literature, from politics to philosophy, and certainly from psychiatry to psychoanalysis. Things have only gotten more complex in the 21st century where the bipolar world of the Cold War and “the end of history” has given way to a multicentric, polyglot cacaphony where culture has replaced class as the dominant signifier and language has become the major expressive vehicle of that shift. In the European Union alone, there are 23 official languages, the UN has 6 official languages, and battles over language as the emblem of culture are evident among peoples affirming their identity everywhere—from Quebec to Catalonia, Rwanda to East Timor.

Whither belonging in all this? The author argues that belonging has become a critical issue for sociocultural psychiatry and for global mental health. Belonging has a bi-valent, ambiguous, deeply unresolved/unresolvable quality, what philosophy calls an aporia, a puzzle. We can begin to describe this puzzle with the dichotomy settlers or sojourners—those who are “here” to settle and those who stay for work or other reasons, for shorter or longer periods, but do not make their home “there.” There is, however, a third state of being, intermediate between sojourners who merely stay a while and settlers who plant roots, and that is those who are still on the journey, in transit, “betwixt and between,” as anthropologist Victor Turner described it, neither here nor there, travellers on the threshold.

Whether it accompanies a language, a nation, a profession, or other organizing system of meaning, the construct of belonging can be more than an aporia for imagining identity and the very definition of subject and subjectivity. “Belonging” is a way of rethinking relational being, how we define mental health, how we understand the expression of its vicissitudes, and how we organize care and healing for sufferers. To do this, we need to recognize how belonging is experienced and negotiated, free of the constraints of our habitual patterns of practice and thought, to imagine belonging without borders for settlers, sojourners and travellers in the 21st century.


References

Di Nicola, Vincenzo F. (1997). A Stranger in the Family: Culture, Families, and Therapy. New York, NY and London, UK: W.W. Norton.

Di Nicola, Vincenzo (2004). Famiglie sulla soglia. Città invisibili, identità invisibili [Families on the threshold: Invisible cities, invisible identities]. In: Maurizio Andolfi, ed., Famiglie Immigrate e Psicoterapia Transculturale [Immigrant Families and Transcultural Psychotherapy]. Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 34-47.

Di Nicola, Vincenzo (2011). Letters to a Young Therapist: Relational Practices for the Coming Community. New York, NY and Dresden, Germany: Atropos Press.

WPA Symposium on Belonging - "Belonging Without Boundaries: Social Psychiatry in the 21st Century"


World Psychiatric Association Congress  
Bucharest, Romania - April 10, 2013

“Symposium on Belonging”

Co-chairs:             Vincenzo Di Nicola and Rachid Bennegadi
Presenters:            Vincenzo Di Nicola, Ileana Botezat-Antonescu, Drozdstoj Stoyanov, and Annelle Primm
Discussant:           Rachid Bennegadi

Abstract (word count: 498)

Belonging Without Boundaries:  
Social Psychiatry in the 21st Century

The symposium will open with a discourse by the co-chair, Vincenzo Di Nicola, on “Belonging Without Boundaries: Settlers, Sojourners and Travellers in the 21st Century.” Di Nicola argues that “the 20th century saw so many displacements of peoples across borders, languages and cultures that the terms emigrants, immigrants and migrants are sprinkled across the literature of every field of human endeavour from law to literature, from politics to philosophy, and certainly from psychiatry to psychoanalysis. Things have only gotten more complex in the 21st century where the bipolar world of the Cold War and “the end of history” has given way to a multicentric, polyglot cacaphony where culture has replaced class as the dominant signifier and language has become the major expressive vehicle of that shift. In the European Union alone, there are 23 official languages, the UN has 6 official languages, and battles over language as the emblem of culture are evident among peoples affirming their identity everywhere—from Quebec to Catalonia, Rwanda to East Timor.”

Whither belonging in all this? The symposium presents belonging as a critical issue for sociocultural psychiatry and for global mental health. The notion of belonging sutures together the social questions of identity and affiliation to psychoanalytic questions of memory and representation to build a crucial construct for social psychiatry and psychotherapy in the 21st century.

Ileana Botezat-Antonescu’s presentation, “Belonging to the group of psychotherapy professionals: Between interdiction and proliferation in different political contexts in Romania,” demonstrates that “Belonging to a professional group just as psychotherapists do from other part of the world (Western Europe or the Americas), was a cherished dream for many Romanian psychiatrists or clinical psychologists before December 1989. We try to follow the developmental process of psychotherapy from the belonging concept perspective toward the cultural and political context in a communist–totalitarian and a democratic society and examine its evolution.”

Drozdstoj Stoyanov’s contribution is an empirical study of “Belonging dimensions in psychological climate and personality as predictors of vulnerability to burn-out.” His discussion highlights that, “The evidence from our pilot study as well as complementary case studies reveal the relevance of belonging as embedded in personality and psychological climate to the emergence of burn out. The following inter-connected study dimensions may elicit belonging: cooperativeness and self-transcendence in personality; cohesion and fairness in the psychological climate at work place and depersonalization as measurement of burn out.”

The final presenter, Annelle Primm, discusses the concept of “belonging” from the perspective of an African American woman psychiatrist born in Switzerland of American parents and raised in the northeast region of the United States.  Her experiences of difference and “otherness” in Europe and the U.S. demonstrate
how she navigated the culturally complicated terrain of “ivory towers” and “ebony communities”. This presentation will focus on the panelist’s journey, her collaborative work as an ambassador across disparate worlds, and her sense of belonging in divergent worlds, supported by mentors of varied racial and cultural backgrounds.


References

Di Nicola, Vincenzo F. (1997). A Stranger in the Family: Culture, Families, and Therapy. New York, NY and London, UK: W.W. Norton.

Primm, Annelle (2012). A Community Psychiatrist Straddling Worlds and Bridging Chasms. In: Women in Psychiatry:  Personal Perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc., pp. 131-145.